The new rules include requirements to report “material cyber incidents” to the RBNZ as soon as practicable (and within 72 hours). They also require periodic reporting of all cyber incidents, whether or not material, and a “self-assessment” survey. This adds to a crowded field of similar existing obligations – including reporting of “notifiable privacy breaches” under the Privacy Act, and reporting of “cyber security events” to the FMA under the new conduct regime.
What are the new rules?
The RBNZ’s new rules fall into three categories.
1. Material Cyber Incident Reporting |
|
2. Periodic Reporting of All Incidents |
|
3. Surveys on Cyber Resilience |
|
How does this relate to other notification requirements?
Under the Financial Markets (Conduct of Institutions) Amendment Act 2022 (COFI) one of the standard licensing conditions requires each licensed entity to “make sure that their critical technology systems are operationally resilient” and provides that if it suffers “an event that materially affects the supply of its service, it must notify the FMA as soon as possible, or no later than 72 hours after it has determined the event is a material incident.”
Helpfully, the RBNZ has confirmed that its new template report for “material cyber incidents” can also be used to submit information to the FMA. However, the thresholds for reporting to the RBNZ and the FMA are not identical. This means that regulated entities will need to consider whether to report to the RBNZ, or the FMA, or both, depending on the nature of the incident.
In addition, if the breach involves personal information and is likely to cause “serious harm” to affected individuals, it will likely require notification to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner under the Privacy Act 2020.
What are the consequences of breach?
The RBNZ’s paper is silent on enforcement. However, it does state that the reports will be required under the RBNZ’s information-gathering powers under existing legislation.1 Failing to supply information under those provisions can trigger significant statutory penalties (up to NZ$1 million under the Banking (Prudential Supervision) Act 1989, or NZ$500,000 under the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010). That is a material potential liability when compared to current penalties for a failure to report a notifiable privacy breach (NZ$10,000 under the Privacy Act).
What should regulated entities be doing now?
To prepare for the new cyber resilience reporting requirements, regulated entities should:
|
Bell Gully’s Consumer, Regulatory and Compliance (CRC) team have been closely monitoring these developments. If you would like further details on the new cyber resilience reporting requirements, or assistance in preparing for the changes, please get in touch with the authors or your usual Bell Gully adviser.
[1] For Registered banks: Section 93 of the Banking (Prudential Supervision) Act 1989; for Licensed insurers: Section 121 of the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010; For Licensed NBDTs: Section 47 of the Non-bank Deposit Takers Act 2013; and in all cases: Section 262 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 2021.