The Privacy Act: What does it mean for employers?
The Privacy Act is arguably one of the most misunderstood (and potentially misused) pieces of legislation in New Zealand.
The application of the Privacy Act in practice is something of a curiosity for many observers who supported its introduction in 1993 as a means for promoting and protecting individual privacy. For the ordinary person, exposure to the Privacy Act is most likely to come in the form of a frustrating denial to access to information - anybody who has attempted to find out whether their spouse is a passenger on a delayed airline flight will know exactly what I mean.
Others may perceive the Privacy Act as a more sinister shield. For example, an organisation may, on one hand, demand an authorisation for access to personal information as a pre-requisite to providing services (such as insurance cover) but may, on the other hand, profess to use the Privacy Act as a reason for not providing any information to that person when their application is declined.
Given the strong perceptions which now exist concerning the application of the Privacy Act, and the possibility for this legislation to be used improperly, it is important for employers who have an appreciation of the obligations which they owe.
The Act enshrines 12 "Information Privacy Principles" which provide guidelines for the collection, use and disclosure of personal information. The key points for employers to note are as follows:
Arguably, many employers regard the Privacy Act as "toothless" because of a perceived inability for action to be taken in the event of breach of any of the privacy principles. Employers who take this attitude should do so at their peril. A person alleging a breach of a privacy principle may make a complaint to the Privacy Commissioner who may then investigate and rule upon the matter. If a settlement is not achieved as a result of that investigation the matter may be referred to the Complaints Review Tribunal which has a broad power to impose penalties (including giving awards of damages).
Quite apart from this, however, employers should bear in mind that other tribunals (such as the Employment Relations Authority) take a particularly dim view of employers who are guilty of Privacy Act breaches. Further, public criticism of such breaches may also be severe.
The principles of the Privacy Act may be complex in their application and, arguably, often misused. Employers would be well advised to ensure that their policies and procedures accord with the requirements of the Privacy Act and that responses to requests for personal information are actioned in an appropriate way.