The Commerce Commission has distributed an article on compliance issues under the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act (the CCCFA) to industry groups.
In its article, the Commission summarises enforcement actions taken against creditors who, in the Commission's view, have breached the CCCFA.
The Commission has:
The following key compliance issues have been highlighted by the Commission:
Improving compliance with the disclosure requirements of the CCCFA is a stated priority for the Commission.
Two creditors are being prosecuted by the Commission under both the CCCFA and the Fair Trading Act for disclosure-related breaches. Specifically, one company failed to update its documents to comply with the CCCFA, and another company disclosed using a faxed photocopy, which was effectively illegible.
Credit fees must be reasonable. The Commission expects that creditors will have undertaken a cost analysis process to set their fees and is using this to decide whether it thinks fees are unreasonable.
It is the Commission's view that establishment fees must be restricted to those costs that are directly attributable to establishing the loan, such as processing the application and documenting the contract.
The Commission has advised a creditor against including provision for the costs associated with bad and doubtful debts in its monthly administration fee. It also notes that no provision for bad or doubtful debts should be included as part of a default fee and that the averaging of the costs associated with bad and doubtful debts over all defaulting debtors is unreasonable and likely to be a breach of the CCCFA.
Third party fees must not exceed what the third party actually charged the creditor. A creditor has been warned about its practice of charging the cost of staff time in carrying out searches of the Personal Property Securities Register.
In November 2005, the Commission issued guidelines on its position relating to "reasonable commission" allowed to be retained by creditors under section 45 of the CCCFA. It has concluded that commissions for credit-related insurance should be no more than 20% of the gross premium. Click here to link to the Commission's website, where a copy of the guideline is available.
The Commission's position is that "any estimate of loss should be calculated on the basis that a creditor will take reasonable steps to mitigate their loss and to re-lend money as soon as possible". Creditors who claim an allowance for the time taken to re-lend the money should be prepared to demonstrate, based on an analysis of its operations, that a delay in re-lending the money is unavoidable and that the extent of the delay has been accurately calculated.
The Commission has warned a creditor for requiring an unemployed debtor to obtain credit-related insurance that covered redundancy.
Another creditor was warned for charging a guarantee fee for a "guarantee" that was, in effect, an insurance contract. The Commission has stated that disguising an insurance product to avoid the requirement to provide a proportionate rebate of the insurance premium to debtors who prepay is likely to be a breach of the CCCFA.
The Commission has made clear its expectation that creditors who use agents or brokers will take reasonable steps to ensure that those agents or brokers also have adequate compliance programmes.
Click here to link to a full copy of the Commission's article.
For more information on any of the cases, articles and features in Financial Services Quarterly, please email Rachel Gowing or call on 64 9 916 8825.
This publication is necessarily brief and general in nature. You should seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters dealt with in this publication.