The Court of Appeal 1 has allowed an appeal by an individual who, in the High Court was found personally liable under a guarantee in a sale and purchase agreement, even though she signed that agreement as a director of the principal debtor and not as a guarantor.
The High Court decision was summarised in the Summer 2006 issue of Financial Services Quarterly.
The Court of Appeal did not dispute that it is possible for a person to sign a contract once but in a dual capacity. However, there is a presumption that, if the person signing purports to sign on behalf of a company or other person, he or she is signing only in that capacity. The court decided that it would take clear words or extrinsic evidence to rebut that presumption.
In this case, the Court of Appeal found that:
Consequently, this case was able to be distinguished from other cases where directors have been found to sign in dual capacities (and is more consistent with decisions in other cases where, on similar facts, directors have not been liable).
The Court of Appeal concluded that it was "fairly arguable" that the individual had signed only as a director of the principal debtor and that summary judgment should not have been entered against her. It was recognised, however, that other evidence may emerge at full trial.
1 Vuletic v Contributory Mortgage Nominees Limited 17 May 2006, Court of Appeal, CA250/05
For more information on any of the cases, articles and features in Financial Services Quarterly, please email Rachel Gowing or call on 64 9 916 8825.
This publication is necessarily brief and general in nature. You should seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters dealt with in this publication.