In this case1, the Court of Appeal distinguished the decision in Edgewater2 (referred to in the Winter 2003 issue of Financial Services Quarterly) on the basis that the sale in this case was made by the mortgagor, and not the mortgagee.
The director of a GST-registered company voluntarily sold a property for less than what was due under the mortgage and, between the sale becoming unconditional and settlement, the company went into liquidation.
The liquidators sought directions from the High Court as to whether they should retain the GST portion of the purchase price and pay it to the IRD or whether all net proceeds should be paid to the mortgagee with the liquidators to account for GST on the total inputs/outputs for the GST period in due course.
The High Court held that all proceeds of sale should be paid to the mortgagee, and the Court of Appeal dismissed the liquidators' appeal, deciding that:
1 Rob Mitchell Builder Limited (In Liquidation) v The National Bank of New Zealand Limited (Court of Appeal CA 16/03, 26 November 2003, Blanchard, Tipping and Anderson JJ)
2 CIR v Edgewater Motel [2003] NZLR 425
For more information on any of the cases, articles and features in Financial Services Quarterly, please email Rachel Gowing or call on 64 9 916 8825.
This publication is necessarily brief and general in nature. You should seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters dealt with in this publication.